A Crisis
of Law Enforcement
By and
As the global economy slides into a deep recession the hypocrisy of
capitalist rhetoric is laid bare for all to see. The beneficiaries of
the freeing of corporate activity from state control now call for state
intervention (in the form of taxpayers’ money) to bail out the banks.
And all because the government didn’t intervene to control the worst
excesses of capitalist greed in the first place!
Amazingly, Gordon Brown is now proclaiming that markets must be moral
and capable of “responsible risk taking”. Some nerve, coming
from the politician who led the most irresponsible attack on business
regulation in the UK. The same principles of de-regulation that applied
to the financial markets have been applied to the regulation of safety
at work, food safety, the environment and every type of damage that corporations
do to society.
This is especially obvious when it comes to the punishment of employers
who kill and injure their workers. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecutions
for health and safety crimes have been virtually halved in 9 years (they
have fallen by 49%, see graph below). Enforcement notices - the on the
spot notices that inspectors issue when they come across breaches of the
law and unsafe practices – have fallen by a third (32%) in the last
9 years. Taken together, these figures represent a dramatic collapse in
law enforcement in the workplace.
During
the same period, there have been some equally dramatic changes in the
inspection and investigation work of inspectors. Research by the Centre
for Corporate Accountability shows that investigations of major injuries
fell by 43% between 2001/02 and 2006/07. HSE inspectors now investigate
just one quarter of the major injuries to members of the public that they
investigated in 2001/02.
So what explains this dramatic fall in all types of investigation and
action taken by health and safety inspectors? There are two main explanations.
First of all, the HSE has been under attack by a series of budget cuts.
In each of the years following 2001/02, it suffered real-terms cuts in
government funding. This funding attack has exacerbated a situation that
finds HSE grossly under-staffed. On 1 April 2002 there was a total of
4,282 staff and on 1 April 2008 there was a total of 3,399 staff (a 26%
fall in 6 years!).
The second reason lies in New Labour’s attack upon the regulation
of business. In 1997, when Labour came to power, it kept the Conservatives’
flagship Deregulation Unit going under the name the ‘Better Regulation
Unit’. It became quickly apparent that things were not going to
get better for the victims of corporate crime. Regulatory impact assessments
(RIAs) were introduced the following year. RIAs are supposed to measure
the costs and benefits of reforms on business, consumers, third-sector
organisations and public authorities of all proposed policy and legislative
reforms. However, the main function of RIAs in practice has been to minimise
the costs of legislation upon business.
But it was early in New Labour’s second term of office that its
plans for a reconstructed system of corporate crime regulation became
fully apparent. A series of “better regulation” reforms led
by Gordon Brown’s Treasury came to a head with the 2004 Hampton
Review which was commissioned to consider how burdens on business could
be reduced by promoting “more efficient approaches to regulatory
inspection and enforcement”. The main
recommendation was a cut in all inspections by a third across all types
of corporate crime, including financial services fraud, food safety, environmental
pollution and health and safety.
The Hampton Review and the reforms that followed have ensured that regulators
are increasingly pressurised into prioritising the interests of business
above the protection of the workforce. The Hampton Agenda not only undermines
the agencies charged with regulating business, but by empowering business
it disempowers workers.
This is not to say that the prosecution rate is the only measure of a
safe workplace. The safest workplaces are those that are solidly organised
and unionised, regardless of how much or little government regulators
intervene. But prosecution rates are a strong indication of the relative
strengths of employers vis-à-vis employees in a society.
At this moment of economic crisis, ordinary men and women are suffering
a double attack. On one hand, our savings, pensions, and our homes are
at risk, and on the other hand, so are the risks we face at work. The
claim that businesses can be responsible risk takers is an insult to all
of us facing the real risks of injury and death at work that are created
by a free-market economy.
A more detailed analysis of this crisis in law enforcement
can be found in a research report available to download at: www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/acrisisofenforcement.html
Hazards Campaign Challenges the Myth of the Safe Workplace
The Hazards Campaign, a network of resource centres and campaigners
on health and safety at work has challenged the latest Health and Safety
Executive published total of people killed at work. HSE claimed they ‘reveal
a reduction in ‘number of people killed, injured or made ill by
work during 2007/08’ and claim ‘229 people were killed by
work.’
The Hazards Campaign challenges these figures claiming they drastically
undercount the numbers killed in work-related incidents, do not include
those killed by occupational illness, and grossly underestimate the numbers
suffering from work-related ill-health. Hazards Campaign spokesperson
Hilda Palmer said:
“This annual misrepresentation of the numbers killed by work could
be called the ‘HSE myth of the year ‘. It contributes to the
undermining of worker and public safety and the case for policies and
resources to be allocated to tackling what is a massive cause of public
ill-health, and masks the huge number of personal tragedies occurring
every day. It also allows encourages a false sense of security by underestimating
the real risk faced by workers and members of the public, and feeds into
the nonsensical ‘elf and safety gorn mad’ media hype, and
demands from business for deregulation, light touch regulation and cuts
in the enforcement burden.
“As we head for global economic meltdown largely due to an uncritical
acceptance that financial business could be trusted to do the right thing,
we can see that deregulation and light touch regulation has brought us
to the brink of disaster. We urgently need to learn those lessons from
the financial sector and look far more critically at what’s really
going on in our workplaces where more workers are being killed, injured
and made ill, than the HSE headline figures suggest and we need more health
and safety law and enforcement rather than less.”
The headline fatality figure quoted in HSE press release ‘229 people
were killed at work’ fails to make clear that this refers only the
workers killed in workplace incidents whose deaths were reportable to
the HSE or local authorities, not those reportable to other enforcement
authorities such as the police, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency or
the Civil Aviation Authority. The 229 headline fatalities do not include:
- an estimated 1,000 who are killed in road traffic incidents involving
‘at work’ vehicles;
- 95 members of the public killed by work activities
- an estimated 30 killed in coastal waters or in aircraft incidents
- the 100-250 suicides attributed to work-related stress
The Hazards Campaign estimates the total number of people killed in work-related
incidents last year as about 1,454 -1,606 which is 6-7 times the HSE headline
figure.
But the iceberg of work-related ill-health is as always, the number dying
each year due to occupational illnesses which the Hazards Campaign estimate
as up to 50,000. This total includes:
- 18,000 deaths caused by work-related cancers;
- 6,000 work-related obstructive lung disease deaths;
- 20,000 work-related heart disease deaths; and
- 6,000 for deaths from all other work-related causes including
restrictive respiratory diseases.
|