|
Back to index of Nerve 20 - Summer 2012 Nerve brought together a few local artists to discuss the problems of copyright and some alternative ways that artists can make a living.Problems of CopyrightAlun Parry:If I calculate how I get paid it isn’t through copyright, it’s
through live gigs and this is the case for most jobbing musicians. Copyright
is for those who’ve made it. Vinny Spencer:One of the things about copyright is that it’s like a worm on the
end of a hook. A singer came to a folk club that I was at a couple of
weeks ago and she told me of a friend of hers who wrote ‘Walking
on Sunshine’. She said that her friend is made for life, and this
was the only song that was a hit for her. This song is everywhere, on
the radio, on adverts, on television. So she’s constantly getting
royalties from that. So for me the issue is this. If you’re a musician
you do not get supported as of right. You can’t just go somewhere
and say, “I’m a musician, can you pay me so that I can live,
and then I can go out and write songs and play music?” We don’t
have any choice but to be self employed and do what we can to make whatever
money we can. Dan Lynch:I believe in copyleft, which is [sort of] the opposite of copyright,
it’s enforced sharing. So what that means, in software terms, is
that if I write a programme and I distribute it under copyleft, you can
read the code and use it in any way. You might say well, it would work
better if it did this, and you change it. You are then legally obliged
to give those changes back to me under the same licence that you received
it in the first place. So this is like some form of digital Socialism. Paul Green:In my time in a band touring we never made any money, and I was always asking other bands how they survived. People were juggling jobs. It’s just admirable what people do to be able to play music. Liverpool is such a vast music community and we need to be more creative in how we develop this. As part of a collective or a co-operative we could use things such as regular live music nights, not just for the music. We could have market stalls and trading could take place; a sort of non-capitalist marketing. We could create our own mini-festivals where things are shared and there is agreement, on a collective basis, how any money can be shared. Ritchie Hunter:From a Nerve Radio perspective we would be concerned that anyone who tries to buck the system and starts to have an effect on things that are happening, with people gathering around, then this would become a focus for the establishment to close them down. If we were putting out music along with stuff that we would like to think is moving people to take action then these copyright laws are what they could use. The reason they don’t use the laws that much now is because most of the people downloading are individuals and don’t pose a threat as such. So this means that Nerve would need to be really careful what we play, and so it is important that we have this dialogue with the artists. Alun Parry is a Liverpool singer-songwriter
who organises the Woody Guthrie Folk Club. See: parrysongs.co.uk/ Nerve are running further radio production courses for people who want to get involved. *Creative Commons has six licences in the public domain including ‘non commercial’, which allows anyone to share unless it is for profit. It gives ‘creatives’ a choice on how to control their work. See: ‘Copyright & Piracy in the Digital Age’
Sorry Comments ClosedComments are closed on this article |
||||||||||