Unarmed
and Dangerous
Directed by Xavier Leret
Film review by 8/12/2010
Did I enjoy watching Unarmed and Dangerous? I'd be lying if I said I
did, which is not strictly a bad indictment of the movie itself, but merely
a statement of the fact that movies such as this are probably not meant
to be enjoyed.
Showing as part of ,
the themes of the film are unappetising in the extreme, as are some of
the visuals of the movie. It's a story of revenge, and apparently a martial
arts film too. The latter happens on a frequency so rare that one forgets
that the tag line attached to the press material is "one of the most
controversial martial arts movies ever", and one would be tempted
to suggest that this is because the tag is somewhat misleading.
Sure, Mat Fraser's blood-covered lead does some kicking around of the
bad guys on occasion (that's how said blood manages to soak him!), and
sometimes the seemingly barely choreographed fights are entertaining in
their short and not-so-sweet realism. But as every bouncer could tell
you, fighting gets boring after a while and this becomes the case here.
The fact he has little use of his arms is of course one notable aspect
that is curiously never explored beyond derogatory references to it.
As the film goes on, more veins are severed and blood pours forth until
it's almost uncomfortable to watch the picture. The torture scenes at
the end are particularly difficult to watch, with the lingering feeling
that you want it to end soon. Doubtless, there are elements of the sheer
brutality of reality in this film, but the execution of much of the action
is off putting in the extreme, and despite this I still valued the experience
of seeing it even if I felt slightly uncomfortable at times.
The ending of the film - a happy one where the family concerned are reunited
- is a welcome relief from the relentless bloodletting and although the
topic of disability could have been explored more effectively, I would
say the film still has some value.
However, I don't plan to watch again soon.
|