![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Quotes:"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly
limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate
within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident
views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going
on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced
by the limits put on the range of the debate." 'There is radical change taking place in this city. The only time we
look back is when people pick our scabs and the wounds bleed. How often
have you heard scousers sentimentally wallowing in the past? Only in recent
times in response to events elsewhere in the country.' 'More than four out of ten items of fruit, vegetable and cereals on sale
in Britain contain traces of pesticide, according to a new report which
reveals the extent of chemical contamination in the food chain.' 'The use of crack cocaine is soaring to epidemic levels, fuelling a dramatic
rise in violent street crime and driving the price down to a record low.
Abuse of the drug has become so widespread that specialist police units
have targeting muggers, carjackers and petty criminals are arresting more
crack addicts than heroin users. A study by the National Association of
Probation Officers shows that crack users typically spend as much on drugs
in a day as heroin users in a week.' Anti-Social Behaviour - What The Professors Say: In essence much of the legislation has a very narrow definition of what
anti social behaviour means. For example, in city centres fly posting
is labelled as anti social but what about billboards which display semi
naked women in order to sell their products, this kind of objectionable
behaviour is not targeted; so too with the litter caused by fast food
companies that is not a target but individual 'litter louts' will be;
the anti social behaviour of car drivers seems to have disappeared from
the government's anti social radar screen, so there is an issue about
definition and who is targeted. Furthermore how will fines work for those
who are already socially and economically marginalized who have little
funds and capital to begin with? Finally, there is a major debate to be
had concerning how responsibility is defined. Again particular groups,
the least powerful, are the targets for government interventions and exhortations
to be responsible; the powerful e.g. corporations, states, individuals,
are not the target groups, their activities, often more detrimental to
our society than the activities of the powerless, again will not be on
the government's radar. Knowsley Council, seemingly happy to allow Sonae to pollute the atmosphere
around its Kirby plant, make local residents sick, and injure its workers,
is rather less tolerant of other 'anti-social behaviour' - earlier this
year it launched a 15-month campaign 'to become Britain's cleanest urban
borough', 'backed by a tough drive to get residents to take action in
the fight against litter'. Its self-proclaimed 'highlight' of the campaign
was the unveiling of Knowsley's new 'secret weapon' in the fight against
grime - 'Phil' the bin is a walking, talking bin who will challenge those
who drop litter instead of feeding their rubbish to him. Despite the council
insisting that the campaign was 'no joke', it was launched on April 1st
2004 or, as it’s referred to, 'April Fools Day'. One of the benefits
of the campaign is to save on "the costs to the Council as it makes
best use of enforcement powers to prosecute litter louts." Clean
streets are fine by me, but what about the health and safety of local
people? Really, it is no joke. Capitalism is a thug's economy, a heartless economy, a base and vile
and largely boring economy. It is the antithesis of human fulfillment
and development. It mocks equity and justice. It enshrines greed... Capitalism
sucks. Does anyone seriously want to contest that? 'A recent Home Office report, 'Hidden Harm', calculated that as many
as 300,000 children in England and Wales have at least one parent who
is a drug addict. At the same time, nearly half of all social services
departments have been found to be failing to adequately safeguard vulnerable
children and in some inner city areas vacancy rates for social workers
are running at nearly 40-50 per cent.' |
||||||||||